• Home
  • U.S. Supreme Court
    • US Supreme Court Briefs
  • News
    • Financial
    • Riviera Beach
    • North Bay Village
    • Palm Beach Sun
  • Videos
  • Gallery
  • Awards
    • The First Amendment Foundation Announces Winners of its 2017 Sunshine Awards
    • Four Time Winner – New Times Broward/Palm Beach “Best Of”
  • About Fane Lozman
  • Contact



NYTimes: It May Float, but a Home Isn’t a Boat, Justices Rule.

January 26, 2013
by Staff
Comments are off
WASHINGTON — A floating home is not a vessel to be regulated under federal admiralty law, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday in a colorful decision that featured photographs and the first dissenting opinion in an argued case since the term started in October. The case was closely watched by businesses that operate floating structures like casinos, restaurants and hotels. Structures deemed to be vessels are subject to federal laws and regulations, including ones concerning safety, employment and taxes. The case concerned what Justice Stephen G. Breyer, writing for the majority in the 7-to-2 decision, described as “a house-like plywood structure with French doors on three sides.” Inside were a bedroom, sitting room, closet and kitchen. A stairway led to an office on the second floor. The home could not propel itself, but it was occasionally towed from one Florida marina to another, sometimes over long distances. In 2006, it was docked at a marina owned by the City of Riviera Beach, Fla. A dispute over dockage fees led to a lawsuit under federal admiralty law. The owner of the structure, Fane Lozman, countered that the court had no jurisdiction because his home was not a vessel. A federal law defines vessels to include “every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water.” The federal appeals court in Atlanta ruled against Mr. Lozman, under what Justice Breyer called an “anything that floats” approach. That, the justice said, was too broad. “To state the obvious,” he wrote, “a wooden washtub, a plastic dishpan, a swimming platform on pontoons, a large fishing net, a door taken off its hinges, or Pinocchio (when inside the whale) are not ‘vessels.’ ” The correct inquiry, Justice Breyer went on, was whether “a reasonable observer” would conclude that the structure was “designed to a practical degree for ‘transportation on water.’ ” Mr. Lozman’s home, he said, did not qualify. In announcing the ruling on Tuesday morning, Justice Breyer noted that the written decision included photographs of the home at issue and of a wharf boat of the sort that the court had ruled was not a vessel in a 1926 decision. “Even though a picture is worth a thousand words,” Justice Breyer said from the bench, “we have written a few words of explanation as well.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed a dissent, which was joined by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. She said the majority’s approach created a “novel and unnecessary” new standard for deciding what is a vessel. “By importing windows, doors, room style and other aesthetic criteria" into the analysis, she wrote, “the majority gives our vessel test an ‘I know it when I see it’ flavor.” She cited a 1964 concurrence from Justice Potter Stewart in which he made that observation about “hard-core pornography.” The majority’s standard was not only “opaque and unpredictable” but also “completely malleable,” Justice Sotomayor wrote. She said she could not say why Mr. Lozman had won. “It is unclear,” she wrote, “why Lozman’s craft is a floating home, why all floating homes are not vessels, or why Lozman’s craft is not a vessel.” The better course, she said, would have been to return the case to the lower courts for a fuller determination of the facts concerning the structure. Instead, Justice Sotomayor wrote, “the majority works real damage to what has long been a settled area of maritime law,” bringing uncertainty to businesses that “rely heavily on clear and predictable legal rules.” In a brief supporting Mr. Lozman, the American Gaming Association, whose members operate scores of dockside casinos, had urged the court to clarify the law in a way that generally left regulation to the states. Andrew Tauber, a Washington lawyer with the firm Mayer Brown who was not involved in the case, said the ruling had left many questions unresolved. “The court has adopted an ill-defined, multifactorial definition,” he said, that “rather than clarifying what constitutes a vessel might engender confusion and future litigation.” Mr. Lozman, for his part, said he had no reservations about the scope of his victory. “I’m levitating,” he said, adding that he hoped the decision would help thousands of owners of floating homes around the country.
About the Author
Social Share
  • google-share

Recent News

Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
Fane Lozman to court: Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
March 14, 2022 2:48 pm
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Lawsuit settlement lets Fane Lozman keep floating home in Intracoastal Waterway, at least for now
December 31, 2021 10:25 am
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Palm Beach County man being sued by Department of Justice
July 1, 2021 9:26 am
Fane Lozman wins supreme cort case
After 2 Supreme Court wins, Florida man gets $875K from city
February 12, 2020 8:07 pm

The Fane Lozman Story

Fane Lozman Activists - Supreme Court Case

This is a true story of a persistent and tenacious underdog who fought against the governmental seizure of 2200 homes and businesses in 2006 only to see that same government arrest and destroy his floating home three years later, for an alleged failure to pay one month’s rent at the marina. Fane Lozman did not give up but continued the improbable climb from a county court eviction case to the US Supreme Court.

Learn more.

Video of the Day

Honors and Awards

Voted not once, not twice, but three times as “Best Of” by the New Times Broward/Palm Beach.

  • 2012 Best Lawsuit- Fane Lozman vs. the City of Riviera Beach, Florida
  • 2007 – Best Political Activist
  • 2007 – Personal Best

Fane Lozman’s SCANSHIFT

SCANSHIFT™ is a revolutionary patented quote display system that allows the user to absorb market information and changing market conditions with a degree of mental and visual efficiency never before available.

Read more.

Copyright © 2018 to 2021 Fane Lozman.