• Home
  • U.S. Supreme Court
    • US Supreme Court Briefs
  • News
    • Financial
    • Riviera Beach
    • North Bay Village
    • Palm Beach Sun
  • Videos
  • Gallery
  • Awards
    • The First Amendment Foundation Announces Winners of its 2017 Sunshine Awards
    • Four Time Winner – New Times Broward/Palm Beach “Best Of”
  • About Fane Lozman
  • Contact



Editorial: Riviera Beach before high court on watery issue

October 01, 2012
by Staff
Comments are off
It started as a catty quarrel over a houseboat, a waterfront proxy battle between boat-owning gadfly Fane Lozman and the Riviera Beach City Council. Somehow, it has ended up in the highest court in the land. Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida, and a mopey, vindictive battle between a skilled agitator and the city officials who loathed him will be decided by nine justices who four months ago were weighing the future of America’s health care system. However the justices rule, and whatever its repercussions for the marine industry, the battle has cost Riviera Beach taxpayers thousands of dollars. Just one example: All five city council members, plus at least two other city officials, were planning to fly to Washington to watch today’s oral arguments in person. How the case got to Washington is a tale worth recounting. When Riviera Beach decided in 2006 to allow private redevelopment of the city-owned marina, Mr. Lozman, who lived in a houseboat docked there, sued to stop it. The redevelopment effort collapsed, and around that time the city decided to evict Mr. Lozman. Acting as his own attorney, Mr. Lozman defeated the city in state court. A few months later, Riviera Beach saw fit to tighten its rules for boats docked at the marina. Mr. Lozman was unwilling or unable to make his houseboat comply with the new rules, so the city went to federal court to put a lien on the boat and have it seized, a drastic action permitted against boats (even ones that are residences) under federal maritime law. A judge approved the request, and the boat was confiscated. In a vindictive touch, the city bought the boat at a public auction and had it destroyed. Beneath all this there is a significant legal issue: whether Mr. Lozman’s houseboat should be considered a vessel. How the Supreme Court decides could have major repercussions for the regulation of boats across the country, and the case is being closely watched by marine industries. Federal law defines a vessel as a “watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water.” Mr. Lozman argued that his houseboat was not a “vessel,” and therefore not subject to seizure, because it had no engine, was not built for transportation and was permanently docked at the marina. It was, he argued, “a residence that just happened to float.” The appeals court disagreed, saying that since the houseboat was on water and had traveled on water to and from the city marina, it met the definition of a vessel. In a legal brief, Mr. Lozman’s attorney argues that that definition is too broad: “Driftwood, for example, is capable of being pulled over water without sinking, as are floating bridges, swimming platforms, doors removed from their hinges, and innumerable other objects made of wood or plastic.” Indeed, defining a vessel as Mr. Lozman suggests seems sensible. Far more sensible, certainly, than his case’s bizarre journey. By Andrew Marra Palm Beach Post
About the Author
Social Share
  • google-share

Recent News

Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
Fane Lozman to court: Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
March 14, 2022 2:48 pm
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Lawsuit settlement lets Fane Lozman keep floating home in Intracoastal Waterway, at least for now
December 31, 2021 10:25 am
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Palm Beach County man being sued by Department of Justice
July 1, 2021 9:26 am
Fane Lozman wins supreme cort case
After 2 Supreme Court wins, Florida man gets $875K from city
February 12, 2020 8:07 pm

The Fane Lozman Story

Fane Lozman Activists - Supreme Court Case

This is a true story of a persistent and tenacious underdog who fought against the governmental seizure of 2200 homes and businesses in 2006 only to see that same government arrest and destroy his floating home three years later, for an alleged failure to pay one month’s rent at the marina. Fane Lozman did not give up but continued the improbable climb from a county court eviction case to the US Supreme Court.

Learn more.

Video of the Day

Honors and Awards

Voted not once, not twice, but three times as “Best Of” by the New Times Broward/Palm Beach.

  • 2012 Best Lawsuit- Fane Lozman vs. the City of Riviera Beach, Florida
  • 2007 – Best Political Activist
  • 2007 – Personal Best

Fane Lozman’s SCANSHIFT

SCANSHIFT™ is a revolutionary patented quote display system that allows the user to absorb market information and changing market conditions with a degree of mental and visual efficiency never before available.

Read more.

Copyright © 2018 to 2021 Fane Lozman.