• Home
  • U.S. Supreme Court
    • US Supreme Court Briefs
  • News
    • Financial
    • Riviera Beach
    • North Bay Village
    • Palm Beach Sun
  • Videos
  • Gallery
  • Awards
    • The First Amendment Foundation Announces Winners of its 2017 Sunshine Awards
    • Four Time Winner – New Times Broward/Palm Beach “Best Of”
  • About Fane Lozman
  • Contact



AP: Floating home not covered under maritime law

January 26, 2013
by Staff
Comments are off
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a Florida man's floating home was a house, not a boat, and not covered under maritime law, in a case that could affect thousands of people around the country who make their home on floating structures in marinas, bays and coves. The high court ruled 7-2 for Fane Lozman, who argued that the gray, two-story craft approximately 60 feet in length that he towed to the marina in Riviera Beach, Fla., should not have been affected by maritime law. Justice Stephen Breyer, who included a picture of Lozman's craft in the opinion, said maritime law affects vessels which are "watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water." The key words, Breyer said, were "capable of being used" and the court was concerned with practical possibilities, not merely theoretical. "We believe that a reasonable observer, looking to the home's physical characteristics and activities, would not consider it to be designed to any practical degree for carrying people or things on water," Breyer said. "And we consequently conclude that the floating home is not a vessel." Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Anthony Kennedy dissented, with Sotomayor saying Breyer's opinion creates a new and unnecessary test. "An objective assessment of a watercraft's purpose or function governs whether that structure is a vessel," she said. "The court, however, creates a novel and unnecessary `reasonable observer' reformulation of these principles and errs in its determination, under this new standard, that the craft before us is not a vessel." Lozman, a former Chicago financial trader, cheered the decision, and said he and his legal team were celebrating the victory. "It leaves you speechless," he said during a phone interview. "It's been a long fight." Lozman bought the 60-by-12 foot floating home with French doors, a sitting room, bedroom, bathroom, kitchen and office space in 2002. In 2006, he had it towed to a marina in Riviera Beach, where he kept it docked. After several disputes with the city, and unsuccessful attempts to evict him, city officials used U.S. maritime law to impose a lien on Lozman's property for dockage fees and damages for trespass. Lozman argued that it was a house, which would have given it some protection from seizure under state law. But federal judges sided with the city, and the property was seized and destroyed. The city, however, was forced to post a $25,000 bond, which Lozman now says he will pursue in district court to reimburse him for the cost of his property, including the furniture and personal possessions that were destroyed after the impoundment of his property. The lower courts were too broad in their descriptions of vessels, Breyer said. "Not every floating structure is a vessel," Breyer said. "To state the obvious, a wooden washtub, a plastic dishpan, a swimming platform on pontoons, a large fishing net, a door taken off its hinges or Pinocchio (when inside the whale) are not `vessels,' even if they are `artificial contrivance(s)' capable of floating, moving under tow and incidentally carrying even a fair-sized item or two when they do so." A structure would not fall under the definition of vessel "unless a reasonable observer, looking to the home's physical characteristics and activities, would consider it designed to a practical degree for carrying people or things over water," he said. Two states with floating home populations, Washington state and California, have laws that are consistent with the justices' opinion, Breyer said. "These states, we are told, treat structures that meet their `floating home' definitions like ordinary land-based homes rather than like vessels," Breyer said. "Consistency of interpretation of related state and federal laws is a virtue." More than 5,000 Americans own floating homes, and there are more than 60 floating casinos in the United States.
About the Author
Social Share
  • google-share

Recent News

Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
Fane Lozman to court: Make Riviera Beach buy my mostly submerged land
March 14, 2022 2:48 pm
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Lawsuit settlement lets Fane Lozman keep floating home in Intracoastal Waterway, at least for now
December 31, 2021 10:25 am
fane lozman lake worth lagoon law suit
Palm Beach County man being sued by Department of Justice
July 1, 2021 9:26 am
Fane Lozman wins supreme cort case
After 2 Supreme Court wins, Florida man gets $875K from city
February 12, 2020 8:07 pm

The Fane Lozman Story

Fane Lozman Activists - Supreme Court Case

This is a true story of a persistent and tenacious underdog who fought against the governmental seizure of 2200 homes and businesses in 2006 only to see that same government arrest and destroy his floating home three years later, for an alleged failure to pay one month’s rent at the marina. Fane Lozman did not give up but continued the improbable climb from a county court eviction case to the US Supreme Court.

Learn more.

Video of the Day

Honors and Awards

Voted not once, not twice, but three times as “Best Of” by the New Times Broward/Palm Beach.

  • 2012 Best Lawsuit- Fane Lozman vs. the City of Riviera Beach, Florida
  • 2007 – Best Political Activist
  • 2007 – Personal Best

Fane Lozman’s SCANSHIFT

SCANSHIFT™ is a revolutionary patented quote display system that allows the user to absorb market information and changing market conditions with a degree of mental and visual efficiency never before available.

Read more.

Copyright © 2018 to 2021 Fane Lozman.